Zur Seitenansicht


The ontological (in)security of similarity : Wahhabism versus Islamism in Saudi foreign policy / May Darwich
VerfasserDarwich, May In Wikipedia suchen nach May Darwich
ErschienenHamburg : GIGA, 2014
UmfangOnline-Ressource (Text, 528kB, 26 S.) : graph. Darst.
SerieGIGA working papers ; 263
SchlagwörterAußenpolitik In Wikipedia suchen nach Außenpolitik / Islam In Wikipedia suchen nach Islam / Fundamentalismus In Wikipedia suchen nach Fundamentalismus / Wahhabiten In Wikipedia suchen nach Wahhabiten
URNurn:nbn:de:gbv:3:5-88278 Persistent Identifier (URN)
The ontological (in)security of similarity [0.51 mb]
It has long been argued that identity matters in international relations. Yet how identity impacts enmity and conflict among states remains the subject of debate. The existing literature asserts that differences in identity can be a source of conflict whereas convergence and similarity lead to cooperation. Nevertheless empirical evidence from the Middle East has long defied this hypothesis. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia which prides itself on being an Islamic model and claims Islamic leadership has opposed the rise to power of Islamist movements in the Middle East. To address this paradox this article builds on the growing literature on ontological security to propose a theoretical framework explaining how similarity can generate anxiety and identity risks. This framework I argue moves beyond traditional regime-security approaches to reveal that security is not only physical but also ontological. I then illustrate the argument through a comparison of Saudi identity risks in the wake of the Iranian revolution (1979) and the ascendance of the Muslim Brotherhood to power in Egypt (2012). Ultimately these cases provide intriguing insights into foreign policy behaviour during critical situations.